Isn't it funny how easily we fight for and defend a place simply because of our ancestry and familial ties? Ancestry that we had no control over, a birth into a family that never asked you if you wanted to join. What right does one have to assert that his nation is superior if he would have fought for a completely different cause if only he was born to a different mother? If I had close ties to the Chinese mainland, I would very likely applaud Albert's recent fixation on asserting China's superiority in China-Taiwan relations. If I was born in Sudan I probably wouldn't even know or care about Asia as simple survival would take precedence over such far off matters. But unfortunately, I cannot tolerate these unrelenting attacks on Taiwan simply because I was born with close Taiwanese ties. My entire extended family lives in Taiwan, I have been there countless numbers of times, and I have come to love it for what it is. No, I cannot say it's better than China, as I have never been to China. But likewise, I do not value the criticism of Taiwan by people who have never actually lived there. Personally, I don't like arguing about such unresolvable politic, but yet I cannot keep quiet as others insinuate that my relatives should be bombed to hell or subject to authoritarian rule.
Much is a victim of how we were brought up, our relative perspectives. Albert says that "younger Taiwanese...butcher the language," but to me, the butchery comes from the mainlanders and their simplified characters. But again, I have no right to judge, as I know barely more than 20 words in Chinese whether they are simplified or not. Albert says that "Taiwan itself has no culture to begin with anyway," which is a clearly exaggerated insult. Yes, some places have less "culture" than other places, but when phrased in that kind of tone, any victim of that statement would respond with indignation, even if they might agree with a less offensive form of the same point. Additionally, many Taiwanese would counter that the so-called Cultural Revolution massacred much of the Chinese culture and drove the proponents of culture to the little island of Taiwan, where they have nevertheless managed to thrive and come up with a much higher GDP per capita. I suppose I would not object to Taiwan being a self-governing part of China like Hong Kong is now. But even now as H.K. is part of China, the central government has not dared to make major changes. Hong Kong has grown to be immensely successful outside of "communist" rule, and so has Taiwan, to a somewhat lesser extent. Yet it is also clear that China is on the rise and soon poised to be more successful than all of its self-governing regions combined.
We could argue endlessly on this topic, as we both have somewhat of a personal stake in the argument, and would likely never give in. But I don't want to. I don't think the Daily Cow was ever meant to be a forum for debate on cross-strait relations. I wish Chen Shui Bian would shut up on the issue of Taiwanese independence. I also wish we would too. Like Al's other post said, WHERE IS THE LOVE? :)
Comments
I don't think that's the idea
I don't think that's the idea: "I cannot keep quiet as others insinuate that my relatives should be bombed to hell or subject to authoritarian rule."
The idea is that Taiwan is denying itself economic opportunities by refusing to be integrated economically with its mainland counterpart. When Hong Kong returned to China, its political structure didn't change much, but its economic opportunities skyrocketed from the increased efficiency from economic integration.
Military invasion is never a good way to end a dispute--in the end, at least one side will be left unhappy, leading to a state of disequilibrium that cannot be stable, at least in the near time. Hence, that is left as a last resort and as China's demonstration to the world (and the rest of China *hint Tibet*) that no political subversion will lead to the disintegration of the country again--too often has it been humiliated in the past by colonial aggressors who only sought to exploit China's resources.
However, with that said, I must clarify that military action is never off the table. Lincoln was willing to sacrifice half a million Union lives (that was A LOT compared to the population at that time, which was ~30 million, including slaves fully valued (not 3/5), for the whole United States) for the integrity of the Union. That's two percent of the Union's population that perished in the name of unity. I personally hope that something devastating like this will never happen, but we mustn't rule out that possibility. I know I am not "patriotic" enough to sacrifice my life in the name of unity, and I don't expect many others to be, either. However, if it will prevent a larger clash years later (as the disintegrated United States may have caused, especially if Britain and France were involved), military action may be necessary to prevent more destruction.
It would be immature for Taiwan to run into the arms of the United States for protection after provoking its bigger, more powerful brother. It is unreasonable that Chen would even think about doing that, dragging America into conflicts it doesn't belong in.
It's not so much the
It's not so much the economics that bother me, nor is it the decision to be independent. On both of those, I am absolutely neutral. Whether Taiwan breaks away from China for that reason, does not strike a chord within me. It's the culture that does.
Jiang Jieshi fled from the Communists less than three-quarters centuries ago, and in the contemporary era, the Taiwanese seem to assert that they have been around for five to ten times longer, and feel that they can afford to leave the Chinese culture behind. In this instance, the UK-US argument fails in every level of the imagination because the United States shares very little to the nation it broke away from. The US is a conglomeration of cultures and ethnic backgrounds coupled with many religious faiths and reasonings, whereas China and Taiwan are very much the same because of the language system and dynastical history that goes back centuries and even millenia. By breaking away from China, and undergoing the process that the below article explains, Taiwan is destroying the culture that made it.
Like Jinghao said above, I am not for military action either. I would hate China forever if they bombed the bajeezus out of Taiwan, and I would hate Taiwan, if they ran into the arms of big brother USA to spite China. All I ask for is the cultural love to return to Taiwan and that Taiwan return to their roots, if nothing else. This ignorance is what leads to civilized downfall.